The teenager who threw a six-year-old boy from the tenth floor of the Tate Modern in London had spoken about plans to push someone off a high building about a year earlier.
One of Jonty Bravery’s carers said opportunities to stop him were missed.
BBC News has obtained a recording of Bravery telling his carers about his plan to kill someone and go to prison.
His care provider, Spencer & Arlington, said they had “no knowledge or records of the disclosure”.
At the time of the attack Bravery, who has autism, was in the care of Hammersmith and Fulham Council. He lived in a flat in Northolt, west London, with round-the-clock care.
In the autumn of 2018, a worker called Olly – not his real name – recorded Bravery talking to him and another carer about his plan to commit murder.
“In the next few months I’ve got it in my head I’ve got to kill somebody,” Bravery said in the recording, obtained by a joint investigation with the Daily Mail.
He also tells his carers he wants to go into central London and visit a tall landmark to push somebody off it.
“It could be the Shard, it could be anything just as long as it’s a high thing and we can go up and visit it and then push somebody off it and I know for a fact they’ll die from falling from a hundred feet,” Bravery said in the recording.
He explains he is fed up with his situation and wants to be sent to prison.
Olly said this was not the first time Bravery had spoken about this plan.
“There were a few incidences regarding trying to hurt people, life-wrecking incidences that he had planned in his head,” he said.
The former carer said he told a more senior colleague about what Bravery had said and played the recording to someone else involved in his care. They both deny this.
In a statement, Spencer & Arlington said there is “absolutely no evidence” that Jonty “may have told his carers of his plan”.
It said there was no record of the disclosure in any care plan, care report or review from managers or his carers, psychologists, or health workers.
However, the company said it recognised the “gravity of this claim” and had reported the concerns to the Care Quality Commission and local authority so they could be examined independently by the serious case review.
Bravery, 18, admitted attempted murder at the Old Bailey and is due to be sentenced this month.
After his arrest he told police he planned to hurt someone at the gallery to highlight his autism treatment on TV.
The victim, a French tourist, suffered life-changing injuries, including a “deep” bleed to the brain, from the attack last August.
In January, his family said he was still unable to stand but could now open his left hand.
Olly said when Bravery went to Spencer & Arlington in the summer of 2018, all trips out were supervised by two carers at all times and had to be risk assessed.
But he claims that in the spring of 2019 the regime changed and Jonty was allowed to go out alone.
He said he recalled conversations with other support staff who told him Bravery had asked to visit the Tate and was later given permission to go out unsupervised by management.
An eyewitness, who restrained Bravery for around 20 minutes after he threw the boy from the Tate balcony, also told the BBC he saw no evidence of a carer or anyone else with him at the time.
Olly said he believed the decision was “strange” and “very wrong”, adding that it showed “a lot of precaution wasn’t really taken in terms of how serious the matter could potentially be”.
BBC News has spoken to a second carer who also said that Bravery’s regime became more relaxed to the extent that he was allowed out on his own, in spite of serious incidents when he was outside the flat.
Spencer & Arlington did not deny Bravery was allowed out unsupervised, either in general or during his visit to the Tate, but told BBC News it would be “inappropriate to make detailed comment” ahead of the serious case review and a pending sentencing hearing.
It was a terrible incident that touched every family: so random and so devastating for a mother who screamed as her son was thrown 100 feet over the balcony.
Now there are more questions for the serious case review set up after the incident.
Why was Jonty Bravery visiting the Tate that day, it’s claimed on his own? And this at a time he was already on bail for allegedly attacking another carer and police worker.
And what happened at the care company after two of Bravery’s carers heard him warn he would do something similar?
The awful conclusion for the French family is that their boy could have been spared the terrible, life-changing injuries he suffered.
At the time of the attack Bravery was already on bail, accused of attacking and racially abusing another carer on a day out.
Spencer & Arlington, which is rated “good” by the care regulator, said it believed it had “acted entirely properly in managing and reporting in its provision of care” for Bravery.
Once aware of the Tate incident it acted “swiftly and properly in notifying all key regulatory bodies”, it added.